Wells Fargo Investment Institute Report Comparing Bitcoin to the Gold Rush of the 1850s

On Monday, a wholly owned subsidiary of U.S. bank Wells Fargo and registered investment adviser Wells Fargo Investment Institute announced an investment strategy with a page dedicated to the crypto bitcoin asset. The organisation’s contributing author and head of real asset strategy, John LaForge, compared crypto investment with “the early days of the gold rush of the 1850s.”

This week John LaForge of the American multinational financial services firm Wells Fargo published an investment strategy for the bank’s subsidiary, the Wells Fargo Investment Institute.

The guide discusses many traditional investments and trends taking place in the world of finance, but the seven-page update also commits a whole page to bitcoin (BTC) and the crypto economy in general. “[Bitcoin], ”LaForge said is 2020’s” best and most volatile performance asset “compared to the equity and other investment vehicles discussed in the strategy update.

Wells Fargo Investment Institute Report Comparing Bitcoin to the Gold Rush of the 1850s
The Wells Fargo Investment Institute’s seven-page report discusses bitcoin in great detail and the author emphasizes that “investing cryptocurrency today is a bit like living in the early days of the gold rush of the 1850s.” The original California gold rush began in 1848 and ended in 1855. The gold rush movement brought 300,000 individuals to the western side of North America.

“2020 has been a wild and crazy year, so it’s only fitting that the best performing group of assets in 2020 has the craziest sounding name – cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency, is up 170% this year – on top of the 90% gains it received in 2019, ”LaForge’s report emphasizes. Despite the crypto hype, neither LaForge nor the Wells Fargo Investment Institute are rocking. The author added:

If you feel left out of the craziness, don’t. Most investors have heard of cryptocurrencies, but few have ever bought or used one.

Wells Fargo Investment Institute Report Comparing Bitcoin to the Gold Rush of the 1850s
The chart shared by Wells Fargo Investment Institute in its latest investment strategy guide published on December 7, 2020.

The author admits that the bitcoin chart (BTC) against the US dollar states that “bitcoin has indeed outperformed gold and the S&P 500 Index over the last three years.” But the LaForge report insists that crypto bidders have a “volatile journey” to “suffer to get there.”

“Investing cryptocurrency today is a bit like living in the early days of the gold rush of the 1850s, which involved more speculation than investing,” notes Wells Fargo’s head of real asset strategy. Still, the banking adviser can’t completely dismiss the crypto economy, and says that “cryptocurrencies could one day become a worthy investment.” For example, LaForge underlines that they have “risen from nothing to $ 560 billion in market capitalization in the last 12 years.”

A Wells Fargo analyst recognizes that digital assets like bitcoin (BTC) are here to stay. “Pads don’t usually last 12 years. There are good reasons for this, ”LaForge admits. Furthermore, a Wells Fargo Investment Foundation contributor said the bank will publish more on the “digital asset space” including its “upside and downside,” the author concluded.

What do you think of the Wells Fargo Investment Institute’s recent report on bitcoin investing? Let us know what you think of this topic in the comments section below.

Tags in this story

1850s gold rush, Bank, Bitcoin, Bitcoin (BTC), crypto assets, Finance, financial services firm, gold, gold rush, investment strategy, John LaForge, Market Cap, S&P 500, S&P 500 Index, volatility, Wells Fargo, Wells Fargo Bank

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Wells Fargo Investment Institute, Wikipedia,

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, nor a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Source